Pages

search

Thursday, 29 August 2013

Guide Concerning How To Battle Asbestos Lung Cancer



Cancer is certainly a very serious problem, with very ravaging effects on people and families. However, if you are able to recognize warning signs, handle the strain and implications from the disease, and understand how to achieve a hold when identified as having asbestos, it is possible to conquer the illness significantly better. These pointers can provide you with a little bit more information which can be employed for overcoming the battles which can be linked to cancer.

Remain active, independent and positive during asbestos treatments. Being active will enable you to maintain your overall health. Remaining independent will prevent you from losing you to ultimately the ailment. Staying positive can ensure you have greatest results within your treatment.

Learn self testing options for detecting breast cancers. Breast cancers is actually a leading reason behind death in women of all ages, and might be identified early through regular breast exams that one could perform at home. If you are able to detect breast cancer early, you could avoid it advancing in stage to a point where your daily life is within danger.

Lots of people suffering with asbestos cancer have post-traumatic stress disorder, popularly known as PTSD. If you notice you have any one of the signs of PTSD, you must immediately get the help of an expert. Indications of PTSD include aversion to the people or places, flashbacks of events, irrational fears, and alterations in your sleep patterns.


If you are living alone, try and stock up on meals if you feel well. Cook up a sizable batch of chicken or soup and freeze it. Since there will most likely be days when your cancer treatment leaves you feeling a bit weak, it will be very beneficial in order to quickly warm food and relax.

An excellent way of avoiding cancer is, will not smoke! At least three in every ten cancer deaths is related to smoking as cigarettes are full of poisons and chemicals that you just inhale with every drag. Quitting is difficult but your body wills thanks a lot daily for accomplishing this.

There are online risk calculators that you can use to figure out if you are in danger of getting breast cancers. They contain questionnaires that assist women determine when they are from the high-risk category for developing invasive cancer of the breast. These are not completely accurate but can present you with a perception about whether it is something you must talk to your doctor.

A lot of women will postpone getting a mammogram because they are afraid of the final results. It really is scary thinking that you might be clinically determined to have cancer but it is far scarier not to hold the screening done. The quicker you catch it the more effective your chances of beating it!

Lung Cancer


Are aware of the symptoms of cancer of the lung, and people who aren't so easy to see. Cancer of the lung is really a fatal disease, simply because that signs and symptoms often mask themselves as other conditions up until the disease has spread throughout the lungs and caused greater damage.
Some types of cancer could be prevented by actions that we take. If you are a smoker, you really need to take into consideration changing that. It is known that smoking can cause cancer of the lung.

Wednesday, 28 August 2013

How to Live a Healthy Life



 Useful Tips to Maintain a Healthy Lifestyle
Learning how to live a healthy life doesn't require you to sacrifice most things you're accustomed to. Sure, there are those who like taking their healthy lifestyle to a whole new level, but that doesn't mean you have to do the same. Everyone has their own way of staying fit in mind and body.
DRAW A LINE BETWEEN PROFESSIONAL AND PERSONAL.
Separate your professional and personal time. All guidance counselors and psychologists will tell you that all work and no play can be bad for your health. The office can get a little stressful, especially when your job demands you to be constantly on your feet. It might have escaped your notice that you're putting in more hours at the office than what is regular for the past three months. Or that you're taking your work home more than usual.
SWITCH YOUR REGULAR OIL TO EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL.
A lot of celebrity chefs these days are advocating the use of extra virgin olive oil. Extra virgin olive oil is best known for lowering the risk of cardiovascular diseases. Other reports also claim that it lowers the risk of cancers as well. Unlike regular oil, extra virgin olive oil lowers your cholesterol levels. Replacing your regular oil to this healthier version can even make the result of your recipe even tastier as it is more flavorful. If you want to start living and maintaining a healthy lifestyle, keep this in mind on your next grocery trip.
WATCH YOUR WEIGHT.
Strive to maintain your ideal weight. A lot of people don't really feel like they have a diet issue, but are shocked when the doctor or nutritionist tells them that they're overweight or underweight. How do you know whether you have an issue or not? Consult your doctor.
Another way to check is by calculating your body mass index (BMI). It's basically a comparison of your height and your weight. There is a mathematical equation for calculating your BMI, but you can also check this Web site out: nhlbisupport.com/bmi and http://healthyinfotipz.blogspot.com This Web site automatically provides you your BMI as soon as you key in your height and your weight.


How to Live a Healthy Life with Diabetes



When you are diagnosed with diabetes it is very important that you live a healthy lifestyle. Diabetes is a condition that is much easier to manage if you take good care of yourself. The following article shares some helpful information you can use when you live a life with diabetes.

Eating regular meals is also great for your body. Your body needs nutrients to survive and it needs them on a regular basis. It is important that you eat at least every three or four hours. Do not just eat anything. It is important that you eat healthy foods that have been advised by your doctor or your dietician. Also, even if you are eating healthy foods, it is important that you eat a proper portion of the food. Eating a proper diet keeps your body nourished and your blood-glucose levels more stable.

It is important to track your blood-glucose levels. Keep a notebook or other journal where you write down your levels each time you test. It might also be a good idea to write down the foods you eat, too. When you do this, it helps you see what is causing your different blood-glucose levels. This will also be helpful to take with you when you go see the doctor as they may want to know this information.

Another healthy thing you can do for yourself is to exercise. Exercise is great for anyone, but particularly good for someone with diabetes. You should aim to get at least half an hour of cardiovascular exercise most days of the week. Any exercise that increases your heart rate and keeps it elevated is considered cardio exercise. There are many different options for this type of exercise. You can walk, run, dance, take an aerobic class or use an exercise machine at home or at the gym. You should also get in a few days of strength training. This type of exercise helps build and maintain your muscle mass. Even if you are not looking to get big muscles, you should still take part in strength training exercises as muscles are used in everything you do in your daily life.

Along with a healthy diet and exercise, you should also be sure to drink plenty of water. It is generally advised to drink at least eight to ten glasses of water each day. Our bodies are made mostly of water, and it is important to keep your body hydrated to keep it running efficiently.


Keep a positive outlook on life. While it may seem like you were dealt a bad hand when you got the diagnosis of diabetes, you still have to remain positive. When you think positive thoughts, it is much easier to be happy and healthy.

         When you have diabetes it is important that you do all you can to keep yourself healthy. While being healthy requires some attention and focus, it is the best thing you can do for yourself. Use the information you have learned in this article to be the best you that you can be. Need help? To learn more visit http://healthyinfotipz.blogspot.com or http://sisnv.net/

Saturday, 24 August 2013

CAUSES OF CANCER




To begin this article, i must say this: note, no information contained herein is meant to be medical advice, always consult your physician before beginning any medical regimen.
There are many causes of cancer, known and theorized. there are definitely many types of cancer, known and experienced. this article is meant to consider three of the researched, possible causes of this dreaded disease: smoking, diet and abortions.
SMOKING
It is widely accepted that tobacco smoke causes most lung cancer deaths. Studies show that tobacco smoke -- including secondhand smoke -- may also contribute to non-lung cancers more than previously thought.
Researchers have used data from the national center for health statistics and concluded that tobacco smoke may have led to more than 70% of cancer deaths among Massachusetts men in 2003.

"this study provides support for the growing understanding among researchers that smoking is a cause of many more cancer deaths besides lung cancer," says researcher bruce leistikow, a university of California, davis associate adjunct professor of public health sciences, in a news release. "The full impacts of tobacco smoke, including secondhand smoke, have been overlooked in the rush to examine such potential cancer factors as diet and environmental contaminants. as it turns out, much of the answer was probably smoking all along."

Researchers compared death rates from lung cancer to death rates from other cancers from 1979 to 2003 among Massachusetts males. Their analysis revealed that the two rates changed in tandem year-by-year from 1979 to 2003.

The researchers conclude that the close relationship between the rates suggests that they have the same cause, which is tobacco smoke.
"the fact that lung and non-lung cancer death rates are almost perfectly associated means that smokers and nonsmokers alike should do what they can to avoid tobacco smoke," leistikow says in the news release. "it also suggests that increased attention should be paid to smoking prevention in health care reforms and health promotion campaigns."

While there are countless reasons to stop smoking, here's one more: it appears that a genetic alteration that occurs in certain colon cancers is linked to cigarette smoking, with smokers almost twice as likely to have this mutation as nonsmokers.

Researchers from the University of Utah found that the genetic alteration, known as microsatellite instability, was strongly linked to smoking in those picking up the habit at a young age and in those who had smoked for many years. They estimated that 21% of all colon cancers associated with this genetic alteration can be linked to smoking. Their findings were reported in the journal of the national cancer institute.

"We have known for a long time that there are differences in the genetic characteristics of tumors," study author martha l. slattery, phd, tells webmd. "The association between cigarette smoking and colon cancer has been believed to be small, because most studies have been inconclusive. this study suggests there may be a link between smoking and specific subsets of colon cancer." slattery is a professor of epidemiology at the university of Utah.

Microsatellite instability is a genetic error found in the "letter" pairs that make up dna, the basic set of instructions found in every cell of the body. This instability has been shown to interfere with a cell's ability to identify and correct the dna mutations that lead to cancer. While microsatellite instability is common in people with an inherited form of colon cancer called hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, these family-linked tumors account for just 2% to 5% of all colon cancers. The microsatellite instability error, however, is believed to be present in roughly 15% of all colon cancers.
"This study is unique because it linked smoking to this mismatched repair," Michael thun, md, who heads epidemiological research for the American cancer society, tells WebMD. "This is some of the best evidence that smoking plays a role in at least some colorectal cancers."

The university of Utah researchers found that colon cancer patients with microsatellite instability were more likely to smoke 20 or more cigarettes a day, were more likely to begin smoking at a young age, and were more likely to have smoked for 35 years or more, compared to colon cancer patients without the genetic error. They found a twofold increased risk associated with cigarette smoking and microsatellite instability in tumors.

The authors conclude that smoking represents the largest risk factor for microsatellite instability in tumors identified to date. Their findings also could help researchers better understand the pathways involved in the progression to colon cancer. Numerous studies have definitely linked cigarette smoking with the formation of colon polyps known as adenomas, which are precursors to colorectal cancer. But studies evaluating smoking in colon and rectal cancers have been far less conclusive.

DIET

To the risk of obesity and heart attack, the government has added yet another reason to avoid eating lots of fat, especially from meat and dairy products: pancreatic cancer.

the national institutes of health has determined that people who indulge heavily in meat and dairy fats are likely more to develop this deadly disease, which will strike more than 42,000 Americans this year and kill more than 35,000, according to the American cancer society.

Men and women who consumed large amounts of saturated fat were 36 percent more likely to suffer from pancreatic cancer, researchers reported online in the journal of the national cancer institute.

The study found that the link between fat intake and cancer was strongest for saturated fat from animal food sources, which were associated with a 43 percent increase in cancer risk. To reach their conclusion, nih researchers analyzed records of more than 500,000 people enrolled in the national institutes of health- diet and health study. Participants completed a food frequency questionnaire in 1995 and 1996 and were followed to track a variety of health issues, including pancreatic cancer. Over an average follow-up of 6.3 years, 865 men and 472 women were diagnosed with exocrine pancreatic cancer.

Among the participants who consumed the highest amounts of total fats, the rate of cancer was 53 percent higher for men and 23 percent higher for women, compared to participants with the lowest fat diets.

Combining the data for men and women, the researchers found that total fat consumption was associated with 23 percent higher rates of pancreatic cancer, while high intake of monosaturated fats was associated with 22 percent higher cancer rates.
They theorized that the association between fat intake and pancreatic cancer could be related to the so-called exocrine function of the pancreas, which excretes enzymes such as those that help digest fat.

They also noted that studies have linked saturated fat to insulin resistance and that diabetes and insulin resistance have been associated with increased pancreatic cancer risk.

Diet link to pancreatic cancer needs more study

In an accompanying editorial, two prominent cancer researchers praised the nih team, although they noted that more research would be necessary to definitively prove a direct link between fat intake and pancreatic cancer.

dr. brain wolpin of the dana farber cancer institute in boston and dr. meir stampfer of the Harvard school of public health noted that pancreatic cancer kills 95 percent of its victims, and though it's far less common than many other types, it's the nation's fourth leading cause of cancer deaths.

Overall, they called on scientists "to push our research efforts in novel directions and provide hope for meaningful progress in this highly lethal disease." 

ABORTIONS

The link between abortion and breast cancer risk is controversial. While several studies over the past few decades have explored the possible connection between abortion and breast cancer risk, the results have been contradictory. Some studies have shown a small increase in the risk of breast cancer in women with a history of abortions while other studies have found no such risk. Even some studies that have shown that a history of abortions can increase a woman's risk for breast cancer have been criticized because factors in these studies (such as reporting bias) may have contributed to inaccurate results.

According to independent experts at the national cancer institute and the American cancer society, there is currently no conclusive link between induced abortions and breast cancer risk. Despite these statements, abortion and breast cancer risk continues to be a controversial subject.

Why has abortion been linked to breast cancer risk?

breast cancer is one of the most common cancers among women and the second leading cause of cancer death in the united states (after lung cancer), excluding non-melanoma skin cancers. Since 1973, when abortion became legal in the United States, the incidence of breast cancer in the U.S. has risen dramatically.

While there has not been any conclusive evidence that a history of abortion increases a woman's risk of breast cancer, abortions have been suggested by some to increase breast cancer risk because of the involvement of the female hormone estrogen.

Near the beginning of pregnancy, estrogen levels increase so that the breasts may prepare to produce milk. After the woman gives birth, estrogen levels decrease again. In fact, full-term pregnancy (especially at a young age) has been associated with a decreased risk of breast cancer in medical studies. However, there has been some concern that if the pregnancy is aborted, a woman's estrogen levels would continue to remain elevated for a period of time, possibly increasing the risk of breast cancer. There is also some speculation (although not proven in human studies) that the breast duct cells, which normally go through a complete cycle of growth, development, and regression during pregnancy and lactation (breast-feeding), may be changed in some way, possibly leading to an increased risk of cancer.

There are two types of abortion: spontaneous (also called miscarriages) and induced (purposely performed). Spontaneous abortions that occur within the first three months of pregnancy are often due to insufficient estrogen levels. However, some believe that unlike spontaneous abortions, induced abortions may increase breast cancer risk because estrogen levels have been elevated and may remain elevated. While abortion and breast cancer risk is controversial, the link has not been conclusively proven.

In fact, a large epidemiological study published in the new England journal of medicine in 1997 showed that the risk of developing breast cancer for women with a history of induced abortion did not differ from the risk for women without a history of induced abortion. In this study, the researchers were able to avoid recall bias (women may not accurately report their reproductive history) since the information on abortions was collected before breast cancer developed.

aside from the issue of abortions, scientists have identified several other risk factors for breast cancer, including: age family and personal history genetics having the first child after age 30 or never having children

smoking/alcohol use diet/obesity use of hormone replacement therapy
Why are abortion studies complicated?

Abortion studies are complicated because the issue of abortion is complex, influenced by emotional and socio-political components. also, determining which abortion studies are valid and which are flawed can be difficult. study results can be influenced by a number of factors, including:

the number of cases observed; a very small number may not be reflective of the general population the type of abortion: induced versus spontaneous (also called miscarriages) accounting for other lifestyle or genetic factors that may influence breast cancer risk the amount of time between abortion and breast cancer occurrence.

A study published in the journal of the national cancer institute in 1994 also shows the potential inaccuracies of abortion studies. In the study, researchers relied on self-reports of abortions from the women. The results showed a 50% increased risk of breast cancer (1.5 times the relative risk) from induced abortions. However, the study did not take into account a number of other potentially important factors, including the number of abortions the women had, the women's age at the time of the abortions, and the length of pregnancy before the abortions. Furthermore, the study did not show any increased risk between spontaneous abortions (miscarriages) and breast cancer risk. Because of the possible inaccuracies, the researchers said that the study did not permit scientific conclusions.

Note: a woman's relative risk for breast cancer can increase due to a number of factors. For example, women with a first-degree relative with breast cancer (sister or mother) have the relative risk of 3.0 to 5.0 for developing breast cancer compared to women who do not have a first degree relative with breast cancer. Therefore, a relative risk of 1.9 or 1.5 for women with a history of induced abortions is small when compared to other breast cancer risk factors. 

p.s. there are many cancer-cure books and articles also. The following is an excerpt from the website of bill Henderson. In November 1990, his late wife, Marjorie, began her four-year bout with ovarian cancer. She died on November 1, 1994. After watching that, it was hard for him to believe that millions of people each year had to endure that same torture. He believes that the treatment she received was the cause of her death, not the cancer. 

THE HEALING REGIMEN

The regimen i recommend for all cancer patients comes at the cancer from seven different "directions." seven different theories about how to deal with cancer cells. All of these seven forms of treatment are gentle (no dangerous, too-rapid "die off"), non-toxic and they all work together. They are, in fact, synergistic. They help each other.
These five conditions must be corrected before anyone can get over cancer:
 1) A weak immune system;
2) A lack of oxygen uptake by the cells;
 3) Excessive toxins;
 4) Acidity; and
5) Specific deficiencies. 

Conventionalcancer treatment (chemotherapy, radiation and surgery) makes all of these conditions worse. In fact, it is responsible for almost all the deaths attributed to "cancer." that's right. The "treatment" causes the deaths -- not the cancer.
why? The conventional cancer treatments are approaching the cancer tumor (or its existence in your blood, lymph system or bone marrow) as if it were the "enemy." kill the cancer cells at all costs! Those costs may be your heart, your liver, your kidneys -- or your life.

Why do they do these things? There are literally 400 other effective ways to treat cancer. All of them are non-toxic and harmless to your other organs. Why doesn't your cancer doctor tell you about these options?

The average cancer patient (like you) generates $1.3 million in revenue for the cancer "industry." do you think they want you to be healed by something that costs pennies a day?